Analysis: Biden’s Alleged War on the Bush Administration — Where’s Obama?

April 12, 2009

Vice President Joe Biden has recently fed into the main stream media’s growing White House side story — his “single handed war” on the past Bush Administration. The latest chapter in the proposed saga came in the form of an interview unrelated to the subject, where Biden, in the process of answering the more or less softball question of “is the US more safe now than before”, made a controversial attack at former President Bush. 

Vice President Joe Biden sits down for an interview with CNN's Gloria Borger and Wolf Blitzer on Tuesday.We are more safe. We are more secure. Our interests are more secure — not just at home, but around the world. We are rebuilding America’s ability to lead. I remember President Bush saying to me one time in the Oval Office — and he was a great guy, enjoyed being with him. He said to me, he said, ‘Well, Joe,’ he said, ‘I’m a leader,'” 

“And I said, ‘Mr. President, turn around and look behind you. No one’s following.'”

Enter former Bush adviser Karl Rove, who later, in an appearance in Fox News’s On the Record, fired back, assuming the political body and essentially answering for the Bush Administration: 

“Joe Biden said, for example, that he spent hours with the president. Joe Biden was never alone with the president for more than a few moments. There was staff in the room at all times. He never said these kind of things.”

“I hate to say it, but he’s a serial exaggerator. If I was being unkind, I’d say he’s a liar. … You’ll notice every one of these incidents has the same structure. Joe Biden courageously raises the impudent question. The president befuddledly answers, and Joe Biden drives home the dramatic response. And I mean, it just — it’s his imagination. It’s a made-up, fictional world. He ought to get out of it and get back to reality.”

Although it isn’t hard or illogical to start with jabs towards both sides in this debate — in my view its important to step back and take a look at what isn’t in this equation, and why. 

It surprises me in more ways than not that President Obama or any of his immediate staff has not stepped in with Biden, as his argument may not necessarily be gaining as much healthy traction as it was designed to receive. This, if I may go as far, may be yet another sign of the new administration’s naive nature, but it may very well be a seasoned strategy. I’ll explain:

Looking back into the illustrious and brilliant Obama/Biden campaign, one might recall the many Bush attacks that took place, which most of the time ended in long, back to back ad campaigns that I believe played a role in Obama’s overall win in the polls. These attacks were fully backed, and ruthlessly pushed forward by the Obama campaign, whether they started via mistake (i.e. Biden’s Indian Gaffe) or for a political gain. But now, as we see another attack initiated, President Obama has held back, unlike the past candidate Obama. So why?

My view is that Obama doesn’t believe Biden picked the best fight in the best time. 

In a time where the Oval Office is already juggling domestic and international congressional problems, as well as the new policies trying to are trying to implemented, most of the official word coming out of the White House has been positive. And because of this, the right wing is more or less starved of talking points to get out into the press — as they would be taken second stage to the President’s news, which is essentially flowing out in a more of less politically healthy way. 

So now that something has indeed come out as an attack, I wasn’t exactly surprised to see a response from the unofficial GOP within the day. Karl Rove, whether himself or a PR coordinator, sensed that this was the loophole that was exactly what they needed and politically pounced on it. 

And it was in fact a good idea. Vice President Biden does in fact have a reputation of both sides of the aisle of stretching the truth, and I am more than assured that this alleged “conversation” did not exist. And because of this exaggeration and Rove’s seasoned ability to pounce, he has created a handle for the White House in the GOP — Joe Biden’s mouth.

But again, there are many ways to play something like this, so I’ll open this up to the commenters: Where was Obama in this exchange, and why did he stay out of it?

— pacer521

4 Responses to “Analysis: Biden’s Alleged War on the Bush Administration — Where’s Obama?”

  1. Daniel Elkus Says:

    I think that VP Biden along with foreign policy should take the backseat, because his constituents are much more concerned about the economy, then the War on Terror in Afghanistan. Also I feel that fixing the economy is fairly doable, but winning the War on Terror will be much harder. The Sovuiet Army could not beat the Afghans, and the US has a military that is spread much too thin. The US has troops all over, and the soviets fought for years and were soundly defeated by a Afghan(Taliban Army that had many distinct advantages. First they knew the landscape, second they were better organized, third hey had caves to hide in and a sympathetic civilian Population, the US has none of these advantages.
    I think ithat the Republicans will have a good argument for 2010/2012 against Biden if he continues to make so many errors. This is probably the first of many errors, just like what happened to him in 1988 when he said things that were not his own. This most likeley will come back to haunt him later in his career, weather in 2012 or 2016 if he decides to run for President.

  2. pacer521 Says:


    If you look around, I think you will find that a lot of people are with you in your point about foreign policy taking a back seat. And I agree that because Biden was essentially picked for his foreign policy expertise, he should as well.

    Your second paragraph makes a great point — the Republican opposition will have a good attack in 2012, but again, he won’t be someone that could take down the entire re-election campaign, because he isn’t the president.

    But in the rest of his career, especially if he runs for president again, Biden will really have some trouble with his ability to gaffe.

    I think this will really backfire if there is a national security breach or attack soon, as he assured that the country was safer.

    Thanks for the comment,


  3. Rachel Says:

    Great to see you back at your blog.

  4. pacer521 Says:

    Rachel — I just moved to another domain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: